Leave a comment
The Hyperqube
Bye bye Miss American Pie
09 November 2009 @ 01:37 am
07 November 2009 @ 08:34 pm
so taking a gander at the periodic table and the date 7/14/1973 breaking it down into
7
14
19
73

7 - N
14 - Si
19 - K
73 - Ta
gematrically speaking nsikta = 444
more 444's
Jesus=444
Yshua=444
Messiah=444
Cross=444
Gospel=444
Jewish=444
Joshua=444
Obedient=444
Increase=444
Forgave=444
English=444
Gematria=444
Church age=444
7
14
19
73
7 - N
14 - Si
19 - K
73 - Ta
gematrically speaking nsikta = 444
more 444's
Jesus=444
Yshua=444
Messiah=444
Cross=444
Gospel=444
Jewish=444
Joshua=444
Obedient=444
Increase=444
Forgave=444
English=444
Gematria=444
Church age=444
Current Mood: qubed
28 October 2009 @ 04:41 pm
just for kicks actual named people
Gen 6:9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
Mat 1:19 Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a publick example, was minded to put her away privily.
Luk 2:25 And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him.
Mat 23:35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
2Pe 2:7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:
2Pe 2:8 (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)
Jas 2:21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
and for the contrarians who speak evil of the righteous - just is the same as
just (Noah)
H6662
צדּיק
tsaddı̂yq
tsad-deek'
From H6663; just: - just, lawful, righteous (man).
just (Joseph, Simeon, Abel, Zacharias, Lot, Abraham)
G1342
δίκαιος
dikaios
dik'-ah-yos
From G1349; equitable (in character or act); by implication innocent, holy (absolutely or relatively): - just, meet, right (-eous)
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.p hp?topic=9754.msg857253;topicseen#msg857 253
Gen 6:9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
Mat 1:19 Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a publick example, was minded to put her away privily.
Luk 2:25 And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him.
Mat 23:35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
2Pe 2:7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:
2Pe 2:8 (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)
Jas 2:21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
and for the contrarians who speak evil of the righteous - just is the same as
just (Noah)
H6662
צדּיק
tsaddı̂yq
tsad-deek'
From H6663; just: - just, lawful, righteous (man).
just (Joseph, Simeon, Abel, Zacharias, Lot, Abraham)
G1342
δίκαιος
dikaios
dik'-ah-yos
From G1349; equitable (in character or act); by implication innocent, holy (absolutely or relatively): - just, meet, right (-eous)
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.p
Current Mood:
chipper
20 October 2009 @ 12:34 am
hmmm, what would you make of this?
Quote
Jer 5:6 Wherefore a lion out of the forest shall slay them, and a wolf of the evenings shall spoil them, a leopard shall watch over their cities: every one that goeth out thence shall be torn in pieces: because their transgressions are many, and their backslidings are increased.
prophecy of benjamin
Quote
Gen 49:27 Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf: in the morning he shall devour the prey, and at night he shall divide the spoil.
the word translated as evenings in the KJV is
H6160
ערבה
‛ărâbâh
ar-aw-baw'
From H6150 (in the sense of sterility); a desert; especially (with the article prefixed) the (generally) sterile valley of the Jordan and its continuation to the Red Sea: - Arabah, champaign, desert, evening, heaven, plain, wilderness. See also H1026.
so more correctly [a wolf from the desert] shall spoil them.
going further Paul of the tribe of Benjamin who receives a "vision" of Jesus and goes into the desert..... [arabia]
do you think the translators of the KJV were purposefully being obtuse?
Quote
Jer 5:6 Wherefore a lion out of the forest shall slay them, and a wolf of the evenings shall spoil them, a leopard shall watch over their cities: every one that goeth out thence shall be torn in pieces: because their transgressions are many, and their backslidings are increased.
prophecy of benjamin
Quote
Gen 49:27 Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf: in the morning he shall devour the prey, and at night he shall divide the spoil.
the word translated as evenings in the KJV is
H6160
ערבה
‛ărâbâh
ar-aw-baw'
From H6150 (in the sense of sterility); a desert; especially (with the article prefixed) the (generally) sterile valley of the Jordan and its continuation to the Red Sea: - Arabah, champaign, desert, evening, heaven, plain, wilderness. See also H1026.
so more correctly [a wolf from the desert] shall spoil them.
going further Paul of the tribe of Benjamin who receives a "vision" of Jesus and goes into the desert..... [arabia]
do you think the translators of the KJV were purposefully being obtuse?
10 October 2009 @ 04:54 am
7/14/1973 to 7/14/2011 is 13880 days. exactly 2 metonic cycles of 6940 days at 4:32
from 12/19/2004 to 7/14/2011 is 2399 days. 2399 is the 357th prime number 357 is 1/2 714.
from 12/19/2004 to 7/14/2011 is 2399 days. 2399 is the 357th prime number 357 is 1/2 714.
Current Mood: qubed
26 September 2009 @ 12:12 am
Daniel has revealed that, in fact, his 2 nephews are the antichrist and false prophet!! Here's to hoping he won't have such a low opinion of them on Tuesday, lol.
The Judgement of San Francisco: Luke 17
" Dani' El said...
@ Troy,
Originally I was called to warn the people of CA, and then after 2 years, I was commanded to focus on making sure the elect of CA were prepared for the flight from the cities of destruction, and to spread the message worldwide.
According to google analytics and other sources, my message has been heard in every country on the earth, all glory to God.
But the main reason that I have been the only one to receive this message, is that the plan is that once I get to Israel, by God's own witness in its fulfillment, I will have great authority to speak for Him there and proclaim the Gospel to the house of Israel.
Yes, the Antichrist and False prophet are alive on the earth and waiting for their time.
They are brothers, and still young men, age 22 and 19 respectively.
I don't expect them to be in power for over a decade or so, but this is another one of my callings.
I was born on 6-4-60, 2 days before 6-6-60 as I am the one to reveal their names.
I am sad to share this with you, they are my nephews.
I don't go into their identities on this blog, as google has removed a blog I had set up before for doing so, but please don't dwell on these 2, keep your eyes on heavenly things.
Baruch HaShem,
Dani' El
September 25, 2009 2:26 PM"
Current Mood:
mischievous
23 September 2009 @ 03:05 am
primes, i love them
7141973
7141991
7142011
first few are basic, starts getting good at 4,5,6
7141973
7141991
7142011
first few are basic, starts getting good at 4,5,6
Current Mood:
mischievous
23 September 2009 @ 02:32 am
so daniel is giving himself absolutely zero way out of this one.
According to him:
http://thejudgmentofsanfranciscoluk e17.blogspot.com/2009/09/judgment-of-san-f rancisco-and-la.html
According to him:
Q- What will you do if it doesn't happen?
Move the date? etc?
A- This hypothetical question is like asking, "When did you stop beating your wife"; for me in the sense that to answer it would mean confessing a certain amount of doubt, when I have none.
I am 100% certain of its fulfillment, and that what God revealed to me is true.
I won't consider that He lied to me, or that He was incapable of making something clear to me.
http://thejudgmentofsanfranciscoluk
Current Mood: awake
17 September 2009 @ 11:18 pm
Nero
Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (15 December AD 37–9 June AD 68),[1] born Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus, also called Nero Claudius Caesar Drusus Germanicus, was the fifth and last Roman emperor of the Julio-Claudian dynasty. Nero was adopted by his great uncle Claudius to become heir to the throne. As Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, he succeeded to the throne on 13 October 54, following Claudius's death.

Rev. 13:18
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
The whole chapter is talking about the beast and then the last verse ( 18 )
it says that the number of the beast is the number of a man. In other words it is saying the beast is a man.
Now lets go to chapter 17:8
8 The beast (man)that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast (man)that was, and is not, and yet is.
The Angel then says that the beast (man)was( before AD 96 when the Angel was telling him this) , is not ( is dead in AD 96 when the Angel is telling him this), and he SHALL ( future tense) ASCEND OUT OF THE BOTTOMLESS PIT.
In the same verse it says they that dwell on the earth shall wonder( be astonished or startled) when they behold the beast (man) who was alive, was dead , and yet is alive.
You can't get around the part where it says the world wonders ( astonished or startled in some translations) about the beast ( man ) that was alive , then dead , and yet is alive. The world wouldn't be astonished about a spirit, but they would about a man who lived 1900 years ago, and had died, yet was alive again.
Now we move on to the same chapter 17 to verses 10 and 11
10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
He says five kings have already fallen ( are dead), one is ( he is king in when the Angel is telling him this) , and one is not yet come ( not here yet)
11 And the beast (man)that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition
And the beast (man) that was alive, is not alive, even he is the eighth king, and is one of the former seven kings.
this is the simple word of God showing us that the beast is a man who comes out of the bottomless pit to become the eighth king, yet is one of the former seven kings. He was alive before AD 96 ,was dead in AD 96 , and shall ascend OUT OF THE BOTTOMLESS PIT to become the eighth king.
Kings are people , not spirits
WHAT ARE THE FACTS?
FACT 1 - THE ANGEL SAID THE BEAST IS THE NUMBER OF A MAN REV 13:18
FACT 2 - HE WAS ALIVE BEFORE THE ANGEL WAS TALKING TO JOHN , BUT NOT ALIVE WHILE THE ANGEL WAS TALKING TO JOHN, AND IS GONNA ASCEND OUT OF THE BOTTOMLESS PIT ( FUTURE TENSE ). AND THEIR CONVERSATION TOOK PLACE IN A.D.96
FACT 3 - HE WILL BE THE EIGHTH KING AND WILL BE ONE OF THE FORMER SEVEN KINGS. WHICH THE ONLY WAY THAT CAN HAPPEN IS IF YOU COME BACK FROM THE DEAD OR THE BOTTOMLESS PIT WHICH IS WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS IS GONNA HAPPEN.
Nero Caesar in aramaic is spelled NRON KSR. Aramaic letters have numeral values like roman numerals.
N= 50
R=200
O= 6
N= 50
K=100
S= 60
R=200
.....666
42

Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (15 December AD 37–9 June AD 68),[1] born Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus, also called Nero Claudius Caesar Drusus Germanicus, was the fifth and last Roman emperor of the Julio-Claudian dynasty. Nero was adopted by his great uncle Claudius to become heir to the throne. As Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, he succeeded to the throne on 13 October 54, following Claudius's death.
Rev. 13:18
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
The whole chapter is talking about the beast and then the last verse ( 18 )
it says that the number of the beast is the number of a man. In other words it is saying the beast is a man.
Now lets go to chapter 17:8
8 The beast (man)that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast (man)that was, and is not, and yet is.
The Angel then says that the beast (man)was( before AD 96 when the Angel was telling him this) , is not ( is dead in AD 96 when the Angel is telling him this), and he SHALL ( future tense) ASCEND OUT OF THE BOTTOMLESS PIT.
In the same verse it says they that dwell on the earth shall wonder( be astonished or startled) when they behold the beast (man) who was alive, was dead , and yet is alive.
You can't get around the part where it says the world wonders ( astonished or startled in some translations) about the beast ( man ) that was alive , then dead , and yet is alive. The world wouldn't be astonished about a spirit, but they would about a man who lived 1900 years ago, and had died, yet was alive again.
Now we move on to the same chapter 17 to verses 10 and 11
10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
He says five kings have already fallen ( are dead), one is ( he is king in when the Angel is telling him this) , and one is not yet come ( not here yet)
11 And the beast (man)that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition
And the beast (man) that was alive, is not alive, even he is the eighth king, and is one of the former seven kings.
this is the simple word of God showing us that the beast is a man who comes out of the bottomless pit to become the eighth king, yet is one of the former seven kings. He was alive before AD 96 ,was dead in AD 96 , and shall ascend OUT OF THE BOTTOMLESS PIT to become the eighth king.
Kings are people , not spirits
WHAT ARE THE FACTS?
FACT 1 - THE ANGEL SAID THE BEAST IS THE NUMBER OF A MAN REV 13:18
FACT 2 - HE WAS ALIVE BEFORE THE ANGEL WAS TALKING TO JOHN , BUT NOT ALIVE WHILE THE ANGEL WAS TALKING TO JOHN, AND IS GONNA ASCEND OUT OF THE BOTTOMLESS PIT ( FUTURE TENSE ). AND THEIR CONVERSATION TOOK PLACE IN A.D.96
FACT 3 - HE WILL BE THE EIGHTH KING AND WILL BE ONE OF THE FORMER SEVEN KINGS. WHICH THE ONLY WAY THAT CAN HAPPEN IS IF YOU COME BACK FROM THE DEAD OR THE BOTTOMLESS PIT WHICH IS WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS IS GONNA HAPPEN.
Nero Caesar in aramaic is spelled NRON KSR. Aramaic letters have numeral values like roman numerals.
N= 50
R=200
O= 6
N= 50
K=100
S= 60
R=200
.....666
42
Current Mood:
hyper
16 September 2009 @ 03:38 am
can you read between the lines?
Gen 49:27
Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf: in the morning he shall devour the prey, and at night he shall divide the spoil.
Mat 7:15
Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Rom 11:1
I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.
Gen 49:27
Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf: in the morning he shall devour the prey, and at night he shall divide the spoil.
Mat 7:15
Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Rom 11:1
I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.
Current Mood:
hyper
16 September 2009 @ 02:27 am
14 days to go till daniel will apparently hyperdimensionalize to Israel just prior to the destruction of Sodom(San Francisco)- his opinion.
http://thejudgmentofsanfranciscoluk e17.blogspot.com/
If you have a chance take a look at the blog. As with most last days christians he lays the blame at the door of homosexuals blaming them for apparently all the worlds ills.
tormented by transsexual Satan, lol.

http://thejudgmentofsanfranciscoluk
If you have a chance take a look at the blog. As with most last days christians he lays the blame at the door of homosexuals blaming them for apparently all the worlds ills.
tormented by transsexual Satan, lol.
Current Mood:
anxious
06 August 2009 @ 02:50 am
24 August 2008 @ 11:05 pm
jesus = 444
cross = 444
gospel = 444
messiah = 444
+ September 11, 3 B.C -- Historian Dr. Ernest L. Martin first article on the subject appeared in 1976, and in 1981 he published his research in "The Birth of Christ Recalculated". In 1991, the book was re-released as "The Star that Astonished the World." Dr. Martin revealed in his book, that the signs in the sky on the night of Jesus' birth occurred on only one day in 3 B.C., and they occurred exactly on September 11, 3 B.C. between 6:15 pm and 7:49 pm EST. [Ibid.]
strange coincidence right? 3 11 9 reversed 9 11 3 => 9/11/ 3 bc
and jesus happens to equal 444 in english gematria and 3119 is the 444th prime number.
cross = 444
gospel = 444
messiah = 444
+ September 11, 3 B.C -- Historian Dr. Ernest L. Martin first article on the subject appeared in 1976, and in 1981 he published his research in "The Birth of Christ Recalculated". In 1991, the book was re-released as "The Star that Astonished the World." Dr. Martin revealed in his book, that the signs in the sky on the night of Jesus' birth occurred on only one day in 3 B.C., and they occurred exactly on September 11, 3 B.C. between 6:15 pm and 7:49 pm EST. [Ibid.]
strange coincidence right? 3 11 9 reversed 9 11 3 => 9/11/ 3 bc
and jesus happens to equal 444 in english gematria and 3119 is the 444th prime number.
Current Mood:
contemplative
16 July 2008 @ 11:47 am
July 16, 1945: Trinity Blast Opens Atomic Age
http://www.wired.com/science/discoverie s/news/2008/07/dayintech_0716
1945: The first atomic bomb is tested successfully at the Alamogordo Bombing and Gunnery Range in a remote section of desert near Los Alamos, New Mexico. The instant the bomb detonated at 5:30 a.m. that Monday, the atomic age was born, and the world changed forever.
The Trinity test, as it was known, was the culmination of the American effort to win the race against Germany (and, ultimately, the Soviet Union) in building an atomic bomb. A mere three weeks after the test, the United States used atomic bombs to destroy the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
But prior to the 16th, none of those involved in the project knew if they had built a devastating new weapon or a spectacular dud.
With gallows humor, the Los Alamos physicists got up a betting pool on the possible yield of the bomb. Estimates ranged from zero to as high as 45,000 tons of TNT. Enrico Fermi, who won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1938 for his work on nuclear fission, offered side odds on the bomb destroying all life on the planet.
J. Robert Oppenheimer, scientific director of the Manhattan Project, was under no illusions about what he and his fellow physicists had wrought. The effects of the blast, the equivalent of 20,000 tons of TNT, moved the intellectual Oppenheimer to quote from the Bhagavad Gita: "If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the mighty one. Now I am become Death, destroyer of worlds."
More prosaically, Dr. Kenneth Bainbridge, site director of the Trinity test, said: "Now we are all sons-of-bitches."
http://www.wired.com/science/discoverie
1945: The first atomic bomb is tested successfully at the Alamogordo Bombing and Gunnery Range in a remote section of desert near Los Alamos, New Mexico. The instant the bomb detonated at 5:30 a.m. that Monday, the atomic age was born, and the world changed forever.
The Trinity test, as it was known, was the culmination of the American effort to win the race against Germany (and, ultimately, the Soviet Union) in building an atomic bomb. A mere three weeks after the test, the United States used atomic bombs to destroy the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
But prior to the 16th, none of those involved in the project knew if they had built a devastating new weapon or a spectacular dud.
With gallows humor, the Los Alamos physicists got up a betting pool on the possible yield of the bomb. Estimates ranged from zero to as high as 45,000 tons of TNT. Enrico Fermi, who won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1938 for his work on nuclear fission, offered side odds on the bomb destroying all life on the planet.
J. Robert Oppenheimer, scientific director of the Manhattan Project, was under no illusions about what he and his fellow physicists had wrought. The effects of the blast, the equivalent of 20,000 tons of TNT, moved the intellectual Oppenheimer to quote from the Bhagavad Gita: "If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the mighty one. Now I am become Death, destroyer of worlds."
More prosaically, Dr. Kenneth Bainbridge, site director of the Trinity test, said: "Now we are all sons-of-bitches."
Current Mood:
anxious
24 April 2008 @ 06:49 pm
What is the correct translation of John chapter 1 verse 1 from the original Holy Bible?
In: New Testament
From the member named JohnOneOne:
Many who take issue with Jehovah's Witnesses' "New World Translation" of 'theos' in John 1:1c (as, "a god") often miss the point that this is 'a singular anarthrous predicate noun *preceding the verb*' - that is, not just that use of the noun 'theos' in the third clause lacks the Greek definite article. This would explain why the examples provided above (John 1, verses 2, 6, 12, 13, 18 and 51) do not apply, that is, simply because they do not fit the same Grammatical, syntatical criteria.
Otherwise, for some specific examples which do, that is, those which represent the same Greek, grammatical construction, please examine the following verses within your own prefered translation of the Bible and see whether the translators had inserted either an "a" or "an":
Mark 6:49
Mark 11:32
John 4:19
John 6:70
John 8:44a
John 8:44b
John 9:17
John 10:1
John 10:13
John 10:33
John 12:6
At each of those verses, identity of the one discussed was not at issue; no, but rather, the class of the individual is. Likewise, at John 1:1c, Jesus ("the Word") is properly identified as "a god," and not as "God," the one he was just said to be "with" (1:1b).
To the notion that this rendering would violate the strict, Jewish monothiestic system of belief, one need examine most any Bible commentary about Jesus' use of Psalm 82:6 within John 10:34 to see that this would not have been the case.
Therefore, regarding the proper translation and meaning of John 1:1, although many will speak about the need to consider the cultural, religious, strictly monotheistic view of the Jews of this period (and so, because of this, offer their objection to an "a god" rendering of 'theos' within the third clause in that, in their opinion, this would have been in direct violation of that position), many, in fact, do not.
Please consider this insightful statement:
"The Hebrew for 'gods' ('el?hîm) could refer to various exalted beings besides Yahweh [or, Jehovah], without implying any challenge to monotheism,…"
Taken from: Blomberg, Craig L. (b.?-d.?). "The Historical Reliability of John's Gospel: Issues & Commentary." (Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, c2002), "The feast of Dedication" ([John] 10:22-42), p. 163. BS2615.6.H55 B56 2002 / 2001051563.
Curiously, another had made the same observation, this time, when discussing John 1:1 in connection with John 10:34 -
"…the Logos was God…. It [the Greek word Logos, more commonly translated "Word"], signifies, among the Jews and other ancient people, when applied to God, every thing by which God reveals Himself to men, and makes known to them His will. In this passage [John 1:1] the principal proof [for "the Word" being identified as God] does not lie in the word ????? [logos], nor even in the word ???? [theos], which in a larger sense is often applied to kings and earthly rulers,…"
Taken from: Knapp, Georg[e] Christian (b.1753-d.1853), D.D., Professor of Theology in the University of Halle. "Lectures on Christian Theology." Translated by Woods, Leonard (b.?-d.?), Jun.D.D., President of Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine. Second American Edition, Reprinted from the last London Edition. (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Thomas Wardle, 1845), pp. 136, 137. BT75 .K64 1845 / 35-22780.
Furthermore, there is this:
"If Moses could be [called elohim, 'a god,' at Exodus 4:16 and 7:1], then, for the gospel writers, so could Jesus [in Greek as theos =?elohim], who was regarded by the New Testament [writers] as the very least a new Moses."
Taken from: Fletcher-Louis, Crispin (b.?-d.?). "4Q374: A Discourse on the Sinai Tradition: The Deification of Moses and Early Christology." Article appearing within: Dead Sea Discoveries, A Journal of Current Research on the Scrolls and Related Literature. (Leiden, Netherlands; New York, New York: E. J. Brill, vol. 1, no. 1; April 1994-), vol. 3, no. 3 (1996), p. 252. BM487.A6 E6 / 96647062.
As alluded to above, quite interestingly, when discussing John 10:34 & 35, although most Bible commentaries accurately discuss/explain the Bible's legitimate uses of the Hebrew and Greek terms for "god" for others throughout a number of places within the Bible (that is, as utilized in a lesser role than in its use for Jehovah), many fail to make the connection between this and its use likewise in a lesser role for Jesus at John 1:1.
Obviously, there need be more evidence to substantiate such a position; but, otherwise, that is just one of the many points I hope to bring out within my forthcoming work entitled, "What About John 1:1?"
Agape, Alan.
john1one@earthlink.net
http://wwww.goodcompanionbooks.com
In: New Testament
From the member named JohnOneOne:
Many who take issue with Jehovah's Witnesses' "New World Translation" of 'theos' in John 1:1c (as, "a god") often miss the point that this is 'a singular anarthrous predicate noun *preceding the verb*' - that is, not just that use of the noun 'theos' in the third clause lacks the Greek definite article. This would explain why the examples provided above (John 1, verses 2, 6, 12, 13, 18 and 51) do not apply, that is, simply because they do not fit the same Grammatical, syntatical criteria.
Otherwise, for some specific examples which do, that is, those which represent the same Greek, grammatical construction, please examine the following verses within your own prefered translation of the Bible and see whether the translators had inserted either an "a" or "an":
Mark 6:49
Mark 11:32
John 4:19
John 6:70
John 8:44a
John 8:44b
John 9:17
John 10:1
John 10:13
John 10:33
John 12:6
At each of those verses, identity of the one discussed was not at issue; no, but rather, the class of the individual is. Likewise, at John 1:1c, Jesus ("the Word") is properly identified as "a god," and not as "God," the one he was just said to be "with" (1:1b).
To the notion that this rendering would violate the strict, Jewish monothiestic system of belief, one need examine most any Bible commentary about Jesus' use of Psalm 82:6 within John 10:34 to see that this would not have been the case.
Therefore, regarding the proper translation and meaning of John 1:1, although many will speak about the need to consider the cultural, religious, strictly monotheistic view of the Jews of this period (and so, because of this, offer their objection to an "a god" rendering of 'theos' within the third clause in that, in their opinion, this would have been in direct violation of that position), many, in fact, do not.
Please consider this insightful statement:
"The Hebrew for 'gods' ('el?hîm) could refer to various exalted beings besides Yahweh [or, Jehovah], without implying any challenge to monotheism,…"
Taken from: Blomberg, Craig L. (b.?-d.?). "The Historical Reliability of John's Gospel: Issues & Commentary." (Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press, c2002), "The feast of Dedication" ([John] 10:22-42), p. 163. BS2615.6.H55 B56 2002 / 2001051563.
Curiously, another had made the same observation, this time, when discussing John 1:1 in connection with John 10:34 -
"…the Logos was God…. It [the Greek word Logos, more commonly translated "Word"], signifies, among the Jews and other ancient people, when applied to God, every thing by which God reveals Himself to men, and makes known to them His will. In this passage [John 1:1] the principal proof [for "the Word" being identified as God] does not lie in the word ????? [logos], nor even in the word ???? [theos], which in a larger sense is often applied to kings and earthly rulers,…"
Taken from: Knapp, Georg[e] Christian (b.1753-d.1853), D.D., Professor of Theology in the University of Halle. "Lectures on Christian Theology." Translated by Woods, Leonard (b.?-d.?), Jun.D.D., President of Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine. Second American Edition, Reprinted from the last London Edition. (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Thomas Wardle, 1845), pp. 136, 137. BT75 .K64 1845 / 35-22780.
Furthermore, there is this:
"If Moses could be [called elohim, 'a god,' at Exodus 4:16 and 7:1], then, for the gospel writers, so could Jesus [in Greek as theos =?elohim], who was regarded by the New Testament [writers] as the very least a new Moses."
Taken from: Fletcher-Louis, Crispin (b.?-d.?). "4Q374: A Discourse on the Sinai Tradition: The Deification of Moses and Early Christology." Article appearing within: Dead Sea Discoveries, A Journal of Current Research on the Scrolls and Related Literature. (Leiden, Netherlands; New York, New York: E. J. Brill, vol. 1, no. 1; April 1994-), vol. 3, no. 3 (1996), p. 252. BM487.A6 E6 / 96647062.
As alluded to above, quite interestingly, when discussing John 10:34 & 35, although most Bible commentaries accurately discuss/explain the Bible's legitimate uses of the Hebrew and Greek terms for "god" for others throughout a number of places within the Bible (that is, as utilized in a lesser role than in its use for Jehovah), many fail to make the connection between this and its use likewise in a lesser role for Jesus at John 1:1.
Obviously, there need be more evidence to substantiate such a position; but, otherwise, that is just one of the many points I hope to bring out within my forthcoming work entitled, "What About John 1:1?"
Agape, Alan.
john1one@earthlink.net
http://wwww.goodcompanionbooks.com
Current Mood:
jubilant
24 April 2008 @ 06:48 pm
Hebrew Names of God
so there's a debate as to what exactly did Jesus, himself, call God. was it yahweh, jehovah? or what? well, Jesus most certainly spoke aramaic, and the aramaic word for God is Elah. sounding very much like the word allah. In fact, the two words are the same, given their different pronunciations, aramaic and arabic. something to ponder.... i've seen ridiculous arguments especially from christians who claim that the only name for God is Jesus.
Elah and Elah Constructs as given in the Tanakh
Elah - Awesome, Fearful One
The origin of the Aramaic word Elah is somewhat uncertain, though it might be related to a root meaning “fear” or “reverence.” It is found only in the books of Ezra and Daniel. Notice the Mappiq in the final Hey for this Name: e-laH.
Elah and Constructs
For each name in the list below, I provide the following information:
1. The Hebrew text for the name
2. The most common English transliteration (in italics)
3. A definition for the name, references to the Tanakh, and frequency information
4. Additional comments, if applicable.
God
elaH
Elah. [basic form]
Aramaic. Name for God as Awesome One.
Reference: Deut. 32:15; 2 Chr. 32:15; Neh. 9:17; Ezr. 5:1, 11; 6:14; 7:12, 19, 21, 23; Dan. 2:18, 23, 28, 37, 44f, 47; 3:15, 28f; 6:8, 13.
God of my fathers
elah-avahati
Elah Avahati. [basic form]
God of my fathers (Dan. 2:23).
God of gods
elah-elaheen
Elah Elahin.
God of gods (Dan. 2:47).
God of Jerusalem
elah-yerushelem
Elah Yerushelem.
God of Jerusalem (Ezra 7:19).
God of Israel
elah-yisrael
Elah Yisrael.
God of Israel (Ez. 5:1).
God of Heaven
elah-shemaiya
Elah Shemaiya.
God of Heaven (Ezra 7:23).
www.hebrew4christians.com
so there's a debate as to what exactly did Jesus, himself, call God. was it yahweh, jehovah? or what? well, Jesus most certainly spoke aramaic, and the aramaic word for God is Elah. sounding very much like the word allah. In fact, the two words are the same, given their different pronunciations, aramaic and arabic. something to ponder.... i've seen ridiculous arguments especially from christians who claim that the only name for God is Jesus.
Elah and Elah Constructs as given in the Tanakh
Elah - Awesome, Fearful One
The origin of the Aramaic word Elah is somewhat uncertain, though it might be related to a root meaning “fear” or “reverence.” It is found only in the books of Ezra and Daniel. Notice the Mappiq in the final Hey for this Name: e-laH.
Elah and Constructs
For each name in the list below, I provide the following information:
1. The Hebrew text for the name
2. The most common English transliteration (in italics)
3. A definition for the name, references to the Tanakh, and frequency information
4. Additional comments, if applicable.
God
elaH
Elah. [basic form]
Aramaic. Name for God as Awesome One.
Reference: Deut. 32:15; 2 Chr. 32:15; Neh. 9:17; Ezr. 5:1, 11; 6:14; 7:12, 19, 21, 23; Dan. 2:18, 23, 28, 37, 44f, 47; 3:15, 28f; 6:8, 13.
God of my fathers
elah-avahati
Elah Avahati. [basic form]
God of my fathers (Dan. 2:23).
God of gods
elah-elaheen
Elah Elahin.
God of gods (Dan. 2:47).
God of Jerusalem
elah-yerushelem
Elah Yerushelem.
God of Jerusalem (Ezra 7:19).
God of Israel
elah-yisrael
Elah Yisrael.
God of Israel (Ez. 5:1).
God of Heaven
elah-shemaiya
Elah Shemaiya.
God of Heaven (Ezra 7:23).
www.hebrew4christians.com
Current Mood:
ecstatic
19 December 2007 @ 12:56 am
at 6:27 into clip
TV Show:The Simpsons
Episode Title: ‘The City of New York versus Homer Simpson’
Season/Episode: 9/01
Original Air Date: 21 September 1997
Production Number: 4F22
Time: 00:06:28
Scene: Homer Simpson receives a letter from the city of New York informing him that his car is illegally parked at the World Trade Centre. Having a negative impression of the place after a past experience there as a young man he is reluctant to retrieve it. However, the rest of the family are excited and holding up a flyer Lisa exclaims they can all travel there by bus. The flyer displays an eye-catching 9 above the city skyline and together with the Twin Towers prominent in the background remarkably resembles ‘911’.
Current Mood:
quixotic
02 November 2007 @ 12:27 am
nothing more than an altar to BAAL. have no doubt about it.
2 Kings 10:26-27 And they brought forth the images out of the house of Baal, and burned them. And they brake down the image of Baal, and brake down the house of Baal, and made it a draught house unto this day.
translated as image in the King James, it is more appropriately translated obelisk or pillar.

and who is Baal??
The antiquity of the worship of the god or gods of Baal extends back to the 14th century BCE among the ancient Semitic peoples, the descendants of Shem, the oldest son of Biblical Noah. Semitic is more of a linguistic classification than a racial one. Thus, people speaking the same or similar languages first worshiped Baal in his many forms. The word Baal means "master" or "owner". In ancient religions the name denoted sun, lord or god. Baal was common a name of small Syrian and Persian deities. Baal is still principally thought of as a Canaanite fertility deity. The Great Baal was of Canaan. He was the son of El, the high god of Canaan. The cult of Baal celebrated annually his death and resurrection as a part of the Canaanite fertility rituals. These ceremonies often included human sacrifice and temple prostitution.
Baal, literal meaning is "lord," in the Canaanite pantheon was the local title of fertility gods. Baal never emerged as a rain god until later times when he assumed the special functions of each. Although there is no equivalent in Canaan of the sterile summer drought that occurs in Mesopotamia, the season cycle was marked enough to have caused a concentration on the disappearing fertility god, who took with him the autumn rain clouds into the neither world.
Baal
oh yeah, do you wonder why there would also be one of these located in the heart of the vatican??

not only that the pillar is located inside an ancient symbol associated with Baal.

2 Kings 10:26-27 And they brought forth the images out of the house of Baal, and burned them. And they brake down the image of Baal, and brake down the house of Baal, and made it a draught house unto this day.
translated as image in the King James, it is more appropriately translated obelisk or pillar.
and who is Baal??
The antiquity of the worship of the god or gods of Baal extends back to the 14th century BCE among the ancient Semitic peoples, the descendants of Shem, the oldest son of Biblical Noah. Semitic is more of a linguistic classification than a racial one. Thus, people speaking the same or similar languages first worshiped Baal in his many forms. The word Baal means "master" or "owner". In ancient religions the name denoted sun, lord or god. Baal was common a name of small Syrian and Persian deities. Baal is still principally thought of as a Canaanite fertility deity. The Great Baal was of Canaan. He was the son of El, the high god of Canaan. The cult of Baal celebrated annually his death and resurrection as a part of the Canaanite fertility rituals. These ceremonies often included human sacrifice and temple prostitution.
Baal, literal meaning is "lord," in the Canaanite pantheon was the local title of fertility gods. Baal never emerged as a rain god until later times when he assumed the special functions of each. Although there is no equivalent in Canaan of the sterile summer drought that occurs in Mesopotamia, the season cycle was marked enough to have caused a concentration on the disappearing fertility god, who took with him the autumn rain clouds into the neither world.
Baal
oh yeah, do you wonder why there would also be one of these located in the heart of the vatican??
not only that the pillar is located inside an ancient symbol associated with Baal.
Current Mood:
hyper
02 November 2007 @ 12:16 am
Revelation 18:23 And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.
here's a snapshot from Google Earth, and yes there is an esoteric meaning to the incomplete pentagram positioned above the white house.
Current Mood:
chipper
